You are here
Home > Weapons > Gun Gripes #158: “Reasonable Restrictions with Military Arms Channel””

Gun Gripes #158: “Reasonable Restrictions with Military Arms Channel””

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars

LIKE WHAT YOU SEE? CONSIDER PURCHASING A MAN CAN:
PURCHASE ONE OF OUR SHIRTS:
SIGN UP FOR OUR EMAIL LIST:
SUPPORT IV8888 ON PATREON:

Tim from the Military Arms Channel joins us today to discuss the concept of “reasonable restrictions” on the 2A that seems to be prevalent these days with the NRA and Fudds in general and why it is poison. Stay tuned, much more on the way.

CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE!

CUSTOM IV8888 PATCHES:

Shirts & other accessories:

AR500 STEEL TARGETS:

FULL30:

Like us on Facebook:

Follow us on Instagram:

Follow us on Twitter:

DISCLAIMER: Our videos are strictly for documentary, educational, and entertainment purposes only. Imitation or the use of any acts depicted in these videos is solely AT YOUR OWN RISK. All work on firearms should be carried out by a licensed individual and all state and federal rules apply to such. We (including YouTube) will not be held liable for any injury to yourself or damage to your firearms resulting from attempting anything shown in any our videos. We do not endorse any specific product and this video is not an attempt to sell you a good or service. We are not a gun store and DO NOT sell or deal in firearms. Such a practice is heavily regulated and subject to applicable laws. We DO NOT sell parts, magazines, or firearms. These videos are free to watch and if anyone attempts to charge for this video notify us immediately. By viewing or flagging this video you are acknowledging the above.

Fair Use: In the rare instance we include someone else’s footage it is covered in Fair Use for Documentary and Educational purposes with intention of driving commentary and allowing freedom of speech.

Copyright 2018, 88 Industries, LLC

Similar Articles

7 thoughts on “Gun Gripes #158: “Reasonable Restrictions with Military Arms Channel””

  1. There is a pro 2A rally in Michigan at the east lawn of the capital building in Lansing if anyone wants to come

  2. if all our guns are gone who will protect us when a foreign enemy invades us???????WE MUST NOT COMPROMISE EVER!!!!

  3. So…..what *WOULD* be a reasonalbe restriction? The answer isn’t none, beasue Justicse Scalia gave several exapmples in the Heller decision. If you really think the answer is ‘none’, then where was Scalia’s logic flawed? And if Scalia’s logic is flawed, does that mean the conclusion that the 2nd amendment is an individual right is also relies on faulty logic? Also Senator Feinstine did NOT, during her infamous interview you mention, infer a full ban on ALL guns, but rather on all ‘Assault Weapons’. What she didn’t have 51 votes for was abolishing the grandfather clause in the ’94 AWB. She had to keep it in there to pass. If she got them 51 votes though, any owners of AWBs taht didnt turn in their weapons would become felons. Throw all the straw men you want out there (becacsue there are just as many serious ‘gun grabber’ proposals for a complete banishment/confiscation of ALL firears as there are calls for all-out civil war from 2A supporters) but do you have any valid logical arguments agaist actual proposed policy? “More pepole die in pools” <--that's a red herring. We're talking restrictions on firearm ownership not pool safety. "More people die of heart and lung disease" <-- another red herring, but we tax the SHIT out of cigarrets and other tobacco products. Because of this smoking rates (the leading cause of preventable heart and lung disease) have plummeted. So then you think it's reasonable to tax firearm ownership into obolivion? If you want to gripe about the 'illogical anti-gunners' attempt three things (1) properly applying logic, (2) actually knowing your opponents proposals and not their starw-man versions, and (3) have some examples of what YOU think is reasonable -OR- sound logic as to why 'their' proposals aren't. I get it, your frustrated....but your video is INFURIATING becasue you're being JUST AS BAD AS THEM!! ....and being too short sighted to realize it.....

  4. Democrats are playing the long game, kind of like the Cylons in Battlestar Galactica.

    I would be more concerned now with the fact that our IS’s spied on an incoming presidential candidate in 2016.

Leave a Reply

Top
Love This Article? Spread It.
X
Hey.. Wanna Subscribe?

Plugin by Master Blogster